Future Ready® · Transportation

See traffic
differently.

An integrated microsimulation, geometric-design and project-delivery suite for any intersection — operations, safety, capacity, alternatives, signal timing, construction staging and design-horizon forecasting on one editable model. Load a project, paste in counts, and the whole suite re-analyses.

Project-agnostic · Methods: TAC · HCM 6th Ed. · MUTCD · AASHTO · HSM · Webster
The Suite

Thirteen modules. Any intersection. One model.

01 Simulation

Operations Simulator

IDM microsimulation with HCM level-of-service for the stop-controlled and signalized junction, including RRFB pedestrian yielding.

Open
02 Geometric Design

Swept Path Analysis

TAC design-vehicle turning checks with tractrix off-tracking, swept envelopes and curb / median encroachment flags.

Open
03 Traffic Control

Signal Warrants

MUTCD peak-hour warrant screening, plotting live turning-movement counts against the Figure 4C-3 curves.

Open
04 Capacity

Queue & Storage

HCM two-way-stop 95th-percentile queues by movement and left-turn bay storage adequacy, drawn to scale.

Open
05 Safety

Sight Distance

Stopping and intersection sight distance per TAC / AASHTO, with departure sight triangles on the junction plan.

Open
06 Active Transport

Pedestrian Crossing

TAC 2014 treatment selection from AADT, speed and cross-section, with the Table 1 matrix and Figure 8 assessment.

Open
07 Visualization

3D Digital Twin

An interactive Three.js model of the junction on the 100% design drawing — live vehicles, shadows, day/night, signal & RRFB states, with orbit and follow-vehicle cameras.

Open
Diagnostics

Analytics & Diagnostics

Monte-Carlo delay distributions, simulated-vs-HCM validation, live trajectory, queueing and time-series diagrams, and a signal phase view — straight off the running microsimulation.

Open
08 Decision Support

Alternatives Comparison

Stop, signal and roundabout options scored side-by-side on operations, safety, queueing and cost with an adjustable multi-criteria weighting.

Open
09 Predictive Safety

Safety & Conflicts

HSM predictive crash frequency, surrogate conflict points and crash-modification factors for each control alternative.

Open
10 Capacity

Roundabout Analysis

HCM 6th single- and double-lane roundabout entry capacity, control delay and level of service by approach.

Open
11 Traffic Control

Signal Timing

Webster optimal cycle and green splits with HCM control delay, critical-movement timing and a phase ring.

Open
12 Project Delivery

Construction TMP

Work-zone capacity, staging delay, queue and road-user cost for lane-closure and flagging options on the mainline.

Open
13 Horizon Analysis

Demand Forecast

Compound growth to the design year with a Monte-Carlo probability of failure, tracking mainline v/c and side-road LOS.

Open
KB Knowledge Base

Standards Library

Every TAC, BC Supplement, PCCG and MMCD value that grounds this suite — sight distance, alignment, clear zone, flare geometry, crossing selection — each linked to its source article.

Open
§620 Roadside Safety

Clear Zone & Barrier

Clear-zone width with horizontal-curve correction, roadside-barrier screening and barrier flare geometry per BC Supplement §620, §610.01 and Table 640.A.

Open
§430 Geometric Design

Cross-Section

Lane and shoulder widths, design-speed range, cross-fall and side-slope by BC road class (Table 430.A), with bikeway and median-barrier guidance.

Open
Workspace

Projects

Create, switch and save projects for any intersection — edit counts, geometry and speeds and the whole suite re-analyses. Then export a WSP report.

Open
See the World Differently
Engineering screening tool — verify against stamped design before use.

Run

Speed
Control
RRFB crossing

View

Follow a vehicle
Night
Shadows
Asphalt overlay
Design drawing
Drawing opacity
Align drawing
Scale
Rotate
Shift E–W
Shift N–S
Clock00:00
Active vehicles0
Throughput (veh/h)0
Worst LOS (sim)
drag orbit · scroll zoom · right-drag pan

Traffic Demand Hwy 7 (Lougheed) × McCaffrey Rd · Agassiz, BC

Count data preset

MoTI turning-movement counts, Hwy 7 @ McCaffrey Rd, May 23–25 2025 (peak hours). Loading fills the per-movement volumes, heavy-vehicle %, and cyclist rate.

Peak-hour volumes by movement (veh/h)

L/T/R per approach. EB/WB = Highway 7; NB/SB = McCaffrey Rd.

Modal demand

6.0%
2.0%
5
20
Counts recorded ~0 peds (proposed facility) and 3–9 cyclists/h. Raise pedestrians to exercise the RRFB.
00:00 Stop-controlled RRFB idle
In 0 · Served 0 · Active 0 · 0 peds · 0 conflicts
Car Truck Bus Moto Cyclist Pedestrian Stopped/yielding

Control & Performance HCM unsignalized (TWSC) / signalized analysis

Run

1.5×

Intersection control

km/h

Summary TWSC

Worst-approach delay0.0 s/veh
Governing LOS
Throughput0 veh/h

By approach

ApprVolv/cDelayLOSQ95
About this model
Geometry follows the MoTI 100% design (Project 13321-0000): Highway 7 carries one through lane each way plus a centre left-turn bay; McCaffrey Rd is a single shared lane each way under stop control; an RRFB crosswalk with a two-stage raised median refuge spans the highway west of the junction. The engine is a microsimulation: Intelligent Driver Model car-following with frontal proximity detection, geometric conflict-point resolution (every pair of crossing paths is pre-computed), priority/right-of-way ranking, HCM gap acceptance for stop-controlled and permissive movements, occupancy-based mutual exclusion so vehicles never overlap, and RRFB pedestrian yielding. LOS per HCM 6th Ed. (unsignalized A≤10…F>50 s; signalized A≤10…F>80 s). The "conflicts" counter reports any residual bounding-box overlaps for QC — it should stay at 0.

Swept Path Analysis TAC design-vehicle turning check · MoTI 100% design

Design vehicle

Turning movement

1.0×

Turn path

14.0 m
Sets the front-axle turning radius the driver steers (clamped to the vehicle minimum). The road geometry — face of curb, raised median, sidewalks, curb ramps, pavement edge and markings — is the exact MoTI 100% CAD (R1-1209), extracted directly from the DWG, not an approximation.

Display

Tracking Results Off-tracking & encroachment by movement

Selected movement

Swept path width m
Max off-tracking m
Median over-run

All movements

MoveSwept (m)Off-trk (m)Result
Swept width = max lateral spread of the envelope. Off-tracking = max inward offset of the rear axle from the front-axle path. "Result" flags the envelope over-running the raised median refuge (quantified, point-in-polygon). Curb & sidewalk over-tracking is shown visually — read it directly from the blue envelope crossing the white face-of-curb / grey sidewalk.
Method & references
The road geometry is the exact proposed design, extracted directly from the MoTI 100% CAD (R1-1209 GEOMLANE xref): face of curb, raised median, sidewalks, curb ramps, pavement edge, tactile pads and markings. A kinematic tractrix model drives the design vehicle's front axle along the turning path; the rear axle (and any trailer) off-tracks inward. Over-tracking is measured against a drivable-area mask built from the real curb, median and pavement-edge lines — so "OVER" = the envelope mounting the curb, median or sidewalk, with the depth in metres. This run is fully independent of the AutoTURN paths in the CAD, for blind comparison. Vehicle dimensions per TAC GDG (HSU, SU, P, WB-20). Confirm against stamped CAD before use in a submission.

Traffic Signal Warrants MUTCD 2009 Ch. 4C · peak-hour volumes

Count data

Major street = Highway 7 (EB+WB, both approaches). Minor street = McCaffrey Rd (higher-volume approach).

Approach lanes

Determines which Figure 4C-3 curve applies and the 100/150 vph minor-street floor.

Live volumes (veh/h)

Warrant ResultsPeak-hour assessment

Warrant 3 — Peak Hour

Major (both appr.)0 veh/h
Minor (high appr.)0 veh/h
Curve threshold0 veh/h

Warrant 1 — Volume (reference)

ConditionNeedHaveMet?
Warrant 1 requires the threshold on each of any 8 hours of the day; shown here against the single peak hour for context only. A full warrant study needs 8+ hours of counts.
Method & references
Warrant 3 (Peak Hour) plots major-street total of both approaches against the higher-volume minor-street approach; if the point is on or above the curve for the existing lane combination, the warrant is satisfied (MUTCD 2009 §4C.04, Fig 4C-3). Warrant 1 thresholds per §4C.02. Warrants are a necessary, not sufficient, condition for signalization — engineering judgement governs.

Queue & Turn-Bay Storage HCM TWSC 95th-percentile queue

Count data

Parameters

h
m

Left-turn bay (centre)

30 m
Highway 7 centre two-way left-turn / storage bay serving EB-left and WB-left movements. Compare to the 95th-percentile queue length below.

Storage ResultsBy movement

Left-turn bay adequacy

95th-percentile queues

Movevcapv/cQ95Q95 m
Stop-controlled / permissive movements only; highway through movements run free-flow and do not store. Capacity = HCM potential capacity from conflicting flow.
Method & references
95th-percentile queue Q₉₅ = 900·T·[(x−1) + √((x−1)² + (3600/c)·x /(150·T))]·(c/3600), with x = v/c, c = movement capacity, T = period (HCM 6th Ed., TWSC). Storage length = ⌈Q₉₅⌉ × vehicle spacing.

Sight Distance TAC / AASHTO SSD & intersection sight distance

Major road (Highway 7)

80 km/h
0.0 %
s
m/s²

Intersection sight distance

250 m
Available distance is limited by the nearest sight obstruction (building, vegetation, curve). Drag to test against the required legs.

Sight ResultsRequired vs available

Stopping sight distance

SSD required0 m

Intersection sight distance

Critical gap tg0 s
ISD leg (each way)0 m
Available0 m
Method & references
SSD = 0.278·V·t + V²/(254·(a/9.81 ± G)) (TAC/AASHTO). Departure sight triangle leg b = 0.278·Vmajor·tg, with critical gap tg = 7.5 s (left), 6.5 s (right/cross) for a passenger car, +0.5 s per additional lane crossed and +0.7/+0.9 s adjustment for SU/WB vehicles (AASHTO Green Book Ch. 9 / TAC GDG).

Pedestrian Crossing TAC 2014 Ped. Crossing Control Guide

Vehicle exposure

AADT estimated from the major-road two-way peak-hour volume ÷ K. Edit K to match local design-hour factor.

Crossing context

m

Pedestrian demand (per hour)

TreatmentRecommended crossing control

Recommendation

Preliminary assessment

Method & references
Process per TAC Pedestrian Crossing Control Guide (2014): screen for a traffic-signal warrant and minimum volumes (>15 EAU/h pedestrians), then select a treatment from Table 1 by AADT × speed × cross-section, with automatic Traffic-Signal overrides for >6 lanes w/ refuge, >4 lanes w/o refuge, or speed >70 km/h. Treatment order: GM → GM+ → RRFB → OF → TS1 → TS2.
Project Workspace

Projects

Every module in this suite runs off one shared, editable model. Create a project for any intersection, paste in turning-movement counts, set geometry and posted speeds, and the whole suite re-analyses automatically. Projects are saved in this browser.

Saved projects

Active project — details

Geometry & design inputs

Peak-hour turning-movement counts (veh/h)

EB / WB = mainline · NB (from south) / SB (from north) = side road
Decision Support

Alternatives Comparison

Side-by-side operations, safety, queueing and cost for the candidate intersection control types, evaluated on the active project's peak-hour demand. The weighted multi-criteria score (lower is better) ranks the options; adjust the weights to reflect client priorities.

Operational & safety comparison

Predictive Safety

Safety & Conflict Analysis

Surrogate safety from the simulation's geometric conflict points, plus HSM (Highway Safety Manual) predictive crash frequency for the intersection and the expected effect of each control alternative through crash-modification factors.

HSM predicted crashes by alternative

Capacity

Roundabout Analysis

HCM 6th Edition single- and double-lane roundabout capacity by approach, with control delay and level of service from the active project's demand and the entry/circulating geometry.

Approach capacity & level of service

Traffic Control

Signal Timing & Optimization

Webster optimal cycle length and green splits for a two-phase signal on the active demand, with HCM control delay and level of service. Critical movements drive the timing; adjust lost time and saturation flow as needed.

Phase & movement timing

Project Delivery

Construction Traffic Management

Work-zone capacity and the resulting delay, queue and road-user cost for staging options on the mainline — full closure with detour, single-lane alternating under flagging, or a lane shift on the shoulder — evaluated against the peak-hour mainline demand.

Staging-option comparison (peak hour, one direction)

Horizon Analysis

Demand Forecast & Sensitivity

Projects the active demand forward at a compound annual growth rate to the design horizon, tracking mainline volume-to-capacity and the side-road level of service. A Monte-Carlo run over an uncertain growth rate gives the probability that the intersection fails (side-road LOS F) by each year.

Design-horizon projection

Knowledge Base

Standards Library

The TAC, BC Supplement to TAC, TAC Pedestrian Crossing Control Guide and MMCD values that ground every module in this suite — extracted from the project Engineering Knowledge Base. Each table links to its source article.

Roadside Safety

Clear Zone & Barrier

Clear-zone width, horizontal-curve correction, roadside-barrier screening and barrier flare geometry per BC Supplement §620, §610.01 and §640.01.

Clear zone (base)
0 m
Curve factor Kcz
1.0
Design clear zone
0 m
Slope class

Barrier flare geometry — BC Supp Table 640.A

Flare length XA
0 m
Lateral offset YA
0 m
Taper ratio
CRB units
0

Clear-zone framework values adopt the AASHTO RDG Table 3-1 basis used by TAC; confirm cell values against BC Supp Table 620.A. Flare geometry is verbatim from Table 640.A (new construction / major reconstruction). Barrier Need Index requires Figure 610.A / the Barrier Warrant Calculator — this module screens the inputs and flags when a formal warrant is required.

Geometric Design

Cross-Section

Lane and shoulder widths, design-speed range, cross-fall and side-slope by BC road class (BC Supp Table 430.A), with shoulder-bikeway (Table 430.B) and median-barrier (§630.01) guidance.

Lane width
0 m
Paved shoulder
0 m
Design speed
km/h
Cross-fall
0 m/m
Desirable fill slope
Min bikeway width
0 m

Monte Carlo
Replications
Warm-up (s)
Duration (s)
idle
Approach

Delay distribution — Monte Carlo

Run a batch to populate. Histogram of per-vehicle control delay (pooled across replications, post warm-up).

Mean delay by approach — Sim vs HCM

Bars = Monte-Carlo mean ± 95% CI (simulated). Diamonds = HCM analytical delay from the active model.

Vehicle trajectory diagram (time–space)

Live: arc-length position along the selected approach vs time. Flat segments = queued vehicles; slope = speed. Press Play on the Operations tab.

Cumulative arrival–departure (queueing) diagram

Live: shaded area = total delay; vertical gap = queue; horizontal gap = vehicle delay.

Live time series

Worst-approach control delay (s), total stopped queue (veh) and throughput (veh/h) during the live run.

Signal phase diagram

One full cycle — green / amber / all-red per movement group. Cursor marks the current point in the cycle (signalized control only).